Using the latest data from the Energy Information Administration (EIA) , oil production remains significantly below historical levels achieved in ‘70’s and ‘80’s. The peak production in 1970 has not been replicated despite significant expansion of drilling activity during the 1980’s.
Oil Drilling and Production
Figure 1 Oil Drilling and Production 
Figure 1 illustrates US historical oil production, as measured by the Energy Information Administration in U.S. Crude Oil Field Production (Thousand Barrels per Day) that dates back to 1920 juxtaposed against U.S. rig count, as measured by Bakers Hughes. The chart suggests that during the first energy shock to hit the US and the world, drilling activity expanded dramatically. By 1981, weekly North American oil rig count reached a high of 4,530 oil rigs in 1981.
U.S. Crude Oil Field Production reached a peak of 9.6 million barrels per day in 1970. In 1981, the height of US oil drilling, oil production was 8.57 million barrels per day. By 2002, U.S. Crude Oil Field Production was 5.74 million barrels per day. Over the last six years oil production declined 10.7% while over this same period, drilling activity as measured by Baker Hughes’ North American Rigs Running weekly rig count, increased 125%.
The decline in U.S. oil production is quite disturbing. During the last decade, a host of new technologies were introduced to help facilitate oil production. Companies such as Dawson Geophysical Co. (DWSN) that enhanced the market for energy exploration by providing seismic data acquisition services. Dawson Geophysical acquires and processes data using 2-D and 3-D seismic imaging technology to assess the potential of hydrocarbon sources below the earth’s surface.
Companies such as W-H Energy Services Inc. that was recently acquired by Smith International, Inc (SII) , offer an array of drilling services such as horizontal and directional drilling for onshore and offshore oil drilling, and 3-demensional rotary steering drilling systems. Smith Int’l is growing revenues at over 19% annually and Dawson’s revenues are growing 53%. With these oil drilling and energy exploration technologies growing at double rates, and drilling activity expanding at 14%, why is oil production falling?
With the rancor of “drill baby drill’ heard as call to solve the energy crisis, energy technologies such as solar and wind energy solutions deserve greater emphasis. Oil will eventually run out. There is a finite amount of oil in the ground. The Tar Sands will not solve the problem. According to Alberta Energy, sand oil production was 966,000 barrels per day (bbl/d) in 2005 and is expected to reach 3 million bbl/d by 2020. Tar sands would only contribute 3.5% towards our current oil consumption of 84.5 million barrels per day.
The bottom line is that our dependence on oil leaves our economy vulnerable. Energy is the catalyst that enables economic development. The longer we are dependent on importing oil from countries hostile to civilized existence, the more tenuous grows the environment. We need to conserve existing energy use and invest into energy technologies that foster the development of alternative energies, thereby, limiting our dependence on oil period.

6 responses so far ↓
1 Allen Taylor // Sep 13, 2008 at 12:00 pm
Nice writing. You are on my RSS reader now so I can read more from you down the road.
Allen Taylor
2 Energy Crisis Information » - oil drilling // Sep 13, 2008 at 12:47 pm
[...] ?DRILL BABY DRILL? ? NO INVEST INTO ENERGY TECHNOLOGY US Crude Oil Field Production reached a peak of 9.6 million barrels per day in 1970. In 1981, the height of US oil drilling, oil production was 8.57 million barrels per day. By 2002, US Crude Oil Field Production was 5.74 million … green econometrics - http://greenecon.net [...]
3 Peter Einstein // Sep 19, 2008 at 9:33 pm
Mike, did you catch the Economist’s Technology Quarterly? Energy conservation can radically change the equation, and usually doesn’t lag the way energy technology development does. This doesn’t diminish the quality of your argument. But Peak Oil becomes less relevant (and more of a moving target) if the consumption pattern is disrupted significantly.
4 Kenneth // Oct 4, 2008 at 7:07 am
You are such a very critical thinker and a nice blog by the way I’m always pleased to see blogs like yours because they share my point of view. If you’d like, you can check out
http://www.alternative-energy-secrets.com. I often go there for I have the same sentiments when it comes to cO2 emissions and how to save up money using alternative, energy-saving methods.
5 Peterk // Apr 18, 2009 at 8:20 pm
Nice article but I wonder if the increased restrictions on where drilling and exploration can take place also has an impact on US production. considering that the entire offshore Pacific coast area, the Atlantic offshore and the Florida Gulf offshore can not be explored or drilled must have be taken into the equation. In addition there are onshore areas which have also been removed from the E&P realm
6 jordan // May 12, 2009 at 12:08 pm
Nice article, to learn about solar energy advantages disadvantages check out my site
Leave a Comment
Check Box